[Numpy-discussion] Eigenvalues did not converge
rpmuller at gmail.com
Thu Sep 1 14:20:46 EDT 2011
Yes, as I pointed out, the problem does run on the Macintosh systems. But
I'd like to be able to run these on our linux supercomputers. Surely this is
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Paul Anton Letnes <
paul.anton.letnes at gmail.com> wrote:
> I recently got into trouble with these calculations (although I used
> scipy). I actually got segfaults and "bus errors". The solution for me was
> to not link against ATLAS, but rather link against Apple's blas/lapack
> libraries. That got everything working again. I would suggest trying to
> install against something other than ATLAS and see if that helps (or, more
> generally, determining which blas/lapack you are linking against, and try
> something else).
> On 29. aug. 2011, at 16.21, Charanpal Dhanjal wrote:
> > I posted a similar question about the non-convergence of
> > numpy.linalg.svd a few weeks ago. I'm not sure I can help but I wonder
> > if you compiled numpy with ATLAS/MKL support (try numpy.show_config())
> > and whether it made a difference? Also what is the condition number and
> > Frobenius norm of the matrix in question?
> > Charanpal
> > On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 08:56:31 -0600, Rick Muller wrote:
> >> Im bumping into the old "Eigenvalues did not converge" error using
> >> numpy.linalg.eigh() on several different linux builds of numpy
> >> (1.4.1). The matrix is 166x166. I can compute the eigenvalues on a
> >> Macintosh build of numpy, and I can confirm that there arent
> >> degenerate eigenvalues, and that the matrix appears to be negative
> >> definite.
> >> Ive seen this before (though not for several years), and what I
> >> normally do is to build lapack with -O0. This trick did not work in
> >> the current instance. Does anyone have any tricks to getting eigh to
> >> work?
> >> Other weird things that Ive noticed about this case: I can compute
> >> the eigenvalues using eigvals and eigvalsh, and can compute the
> >> eigenvals/vecs using eig(). The matrix is real symmetric, and Ive
> >> tested that its symmetric enough by forcibly symmetrizing it.
> >> Thanks in advance for any help you can offer.
> > _______________________________________________
> > NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> > NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
rpmuller at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NumPy-Discussion