[Numpy-discussion] 64bit infrastructure
travis at continuum.io
Mon Aug 20 18:51:37 EDT 2012
I'm actually not sure, why. I think the issue is making sure that the release manager can actually "build" NumPy without having to buy a particular compiler.
But, I would rather have official builds of NumPy for all platforms with a compiler paid for by a NumPy-sponsor than not have them.
On Aug 20, 2012, at 5:28 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Ralf Gommers > The problem is that,
> unlike 32-bit builds, they can't be made with open
>> source compilers on Windows. So unless we're okay with that,
> Why does it have to be built with open-source compilers? we're
> building against the python.org python, yes? Which is built with the
> MS compiler -- so why the insistance on open-source?
> Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
> Emergency Response Division
> NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice
> 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax
> Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception
> Chris.Barker at noaa.gov
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
More information about the NumPy-Discussion