[Numpy-discussion] Status of the 1.7 release

[Nathaniel Smith]

#294 is a regression, so probably should be considered release critical. I
can't tell if #2750 is a real problem or not. #378 looks serious, but
afaict has actually been fixed even though the bug is still marked open? At
least fixed in 1.7.x?
On 15 Dec 2012 23:52, "Ondřej Čertík" <ondrej.certik at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> If you go to the issues for 1.7 and click "high priority":
>
>
> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues?labels=priority%3A+high&milestone=3&state=open
>
> you will see 3 issues as of right now. Two of those have PR attached.
> It's been a lot of work
> to get to this point and I'd like to thank all of you for helping out
> with the issues.
>
>
> In particular, I have just fixed a very annoying segfault (#2738) in the
> PR:
>
> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/2831
>
> If you can review that one carefully, that would be highly
> appreciated. The more people the better,
> it's a reference counting issue and since this would go into the 1.7
> release and it's in the core of numpy,
> I want to make sure that it's correct.
>
> So the last high priority issue is:
>
> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/568
>
> and that's the one I will be concentrating on now. After it's fixed, I
> think we are ready to release the rc1.
>
> There are more open issues (that are not "high priority"):
>
> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues?labels=&milestone=3&page=1&state=open
>
> But I don't think we should delay the release any longer because of
> them. Let me know if there
> are any objections. Of course, if you attach a PR fixing any of those,
> we'll merge it.
>
> Ondrej
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20121216/1d50dc2a/attachment.html>