[Numpy-discussion] Pull request: Split maskna support out of mainline into a branch
njs at pobox.com
Thu Jun 14 14:32:09 EDT 2012
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 5:20 PM, David Cournapeau <cournape at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Nathaniel Smith <njs at pobox.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Nathaniel Smith <njs at pobox.com> wrote:
>> > Just submitted this pull request for discussion:
>> > https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/297
>> > As per earlier discussion on the list, this PR attempts to remove
>> > exactly and only the maskna-related code from numpy mainline:
>> > http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2012-May/062417.html
>> > The suggestion is that we merge this to master for the 1.7 release,
>> > and immediately "git revert" it on a branch so that it can be modified
>> > further without blocking the release.
>> > The first patch does the actual maskna removal; the second and third
>> > rearrange things so that PyArray_ReduceWrapper does not end up in the
>> > public API, for reasons described therein.
>> > All tests pass with Python 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 2.7, 3.1, 3.2 on 64-bit
>> > Ubuntu. The docs also appear to build. Before I re-based this I also
>> > tested against Scipy, matplotlib, and pandas, and all were fine.
>> While it's tempting to think that the lack of response to this
>> email/PR indicates that everyone now agrees with me about how to
>> proceed with the NA work, I'm for some reason unconvinced...
>> Any objections to merging this?
> No objection, but could you wait for this WE ? I am in the middle of
> setting up a buildbot for windows for numpy (for both mingw and MSVC
> compilers), and that would be a good way to test it.
Sure, I doubt it would go in before then anyway.
IME you'll need more than one test commit to get a buildbot going... a
useful trick I learned here:
is to point the buildbot at your private clone, and then you can do
test commits to your heart's content.
More information about the NumPy-Discussion