[Numpy-discussion] API policy

Nathaniel Smith njs at pobox.com
Wed Jun 27 12:52:29 EDT 2012

On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Ralf Gommers
<ralf.gommers at googlemail.com> wrote:
> I agree with what you're arguing for here (as little impact as possible on
> existing users), but your view of especially 1.6.x seems to be skewed by
> regressions and changes that were either unintended or thought to be okay
> because the affected numpy behavior was undocumented / off-label / untested.
> The poor test coverage being the number one culprit (example regression:
> http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/2078).

Thanks for the reminder...


More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list