[Numpy-discussion] Missing data again

Eric Firing efiring at hawaii.edu
Wed Mar 7 16:35:12 EST 2012


On 03/07/2012 11:15 AM, Pierre Haessig wrote:
> Hi,
> Le 07/03/2012 20:57, Eric Firing a écrit :
>> In other words, good low-level support for numpy.ma functionality?
> Coming back to *existing* ma support, I was just wondering whether it
> was now possible to "np.save" a masked array.
> (I'm using numpy 1.5)

No, not with the mask preserved.  This is one of the improvements I am 
hoping for with the upcoming missing data work.

Eric

> In the end, this is the most annoying problem I have with the existing
> ma module which otherwise is pretty useful to me. I'm happy not to need
> to process 100% of my data though.
>
> Best,
> Pierre
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion




More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list