[Numpy-discussion] Issue Tracking
Charles R Harris
charlesr.harris at gmail.com
Tue May 1 20:24:11 EDT 2012
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 6:18 PM, <josef.pktd at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Pauli Virtanen <pav at iki.fi> wrote:
> > 01.05.2012 21:34, Ralf Gommers kirjoitti:
> > [clip]
> >> At this point it's probably good to look again at the problems we want
> >> to solve:
> >> 1. responsive user interface (must absolutely have)
> > Now that it comes too late: with some luck, I've possibly hit on what
> > was ailing the Tracs (max_diff_bytes configured too large). Let's see if
> > things work better from now on...
> much better now
> If I were still going through tickets in scipy, I would prefer this view
> to something like this
> I never figured out how to effectively search in github, while with
> trac, I could always immediately reply to a question with the relevant
> link, or check the history instead of relying on memory.
I would agree that a good search facility is essential, and not keyword/tag
based. I've found some trac tickets with google on occasion, although not
by initial intent.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NumPy-Discussion