[Numpy-discussion] pre-PEP for making creative forking of NumPy less destructive
robert.kern at gmail.com
Fri May 18 14:15:26 EDT 2012
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
<d.s.seljebotn at astro.uio.no> wrote:
> On 05/18/2012 05:00 PM, Henry Gomersall wrote:
>> On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 14:45 +0200, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>>> I would focus on the 'polymorphic C API' spin. PyObject_GetItem is
>>> polymorphic, but there is no standard way for 3rd party libraries to
>>> make such functions.
>>> So let's find a C API that's NOT about arrays at all and show how some
>>> polymorphism may help.
>> so memory mapped IO or something?
> A C API towards a Python extension that's in wide use; an analog to the
> NumPy C API in a different domain. Something like a web server or
> database Python extension module which also exports a C API for writing
> other Python extension modules against it.
> I'm not even sure if such a thing exists, in which case NumPy would
> indeed be a special case.
numpy *is* pretty unique in this regard. The need for this style of
polymorphism at this level is even rarer.
More information about the NumPy-Discussion