[Numpy-discussion] Separating out the maskna code
njs at pobox.com
Sun May 20 14:02:46 EDT 2012
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Ralf Gommers
<ralf.gommers at googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Nathaniel Smith <njs at pobox.com> wrote:
>> Ralf, IIUC merging this and my other outstanding PRs would leave the
>> datetime issues on python3/win32 as the only outstanding blocker?
> Yes. There are some more open tickets for 1.7 (see
> http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/report/3), but I don't consider any of those
> blockers. Although #2078 should probably be fixed, since it's a regression.
I took a look at #2078 actually, and it's easy to fix:
But, because of all the churn in the reduction code that the
separate-maskna branch has, I made that patch against separate-maskna
instead of master. So, I'll wait to see how that shakes out before
making a pull request for #2078.
More information about the NumPy-Discussion