[Numpy-discussion] Issue tracking

David Cournapeau cournape at gmail.com
Tue Oct 23 10:58:42 EDT 2012

On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 5:05 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones <thouis at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones <thouis at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones <thouis at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones <thouis at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I started the import with the oldest 75 and newest 125 Trac issues,
>>>> and will wait a few hours to do the rest to allow feedback, just in
>>>> case something is broken that I haven't noticed.
>>>> I did make one change to better emulate Trac behavior.  Some Trac
>>>> usernames are also email addresses, which Trac anonymizes in its
>>>> display.  I decided it was safer to do the same.
>>> The import is running again, though I've been having some failures in
>>> a few comments and general hangs (these might be network related).
>>> I'm keeping track of which issues might have had difficulties.
>>> @endolith noticed that I didn't correctly relink #XXX trac id numbers
>>> to github id numbers (both trac and github create links
>>> automatically), so that will have to be handled by a postprocessing
>>> script (which it probably would have, anyway, since the github # isn't
>>> known before import).
>> Import has finished.
>> The following trac #s had issues in creating the comments (I think due
>> to network problems): 182, 297, 619, 621, 902, 904, 909 913, 914, 915,
>> 1044, 1526.  I'll review them and see if I can pull in anything
>> missing
>> I'll also work on a script for updating the trac crossrefs to github crossrefs.
>> In the "no good deed goes unpunished" category, I accidentally logged
>> in as myself (rather than numpy-gitbot) and pushed about 500 issues,
>> so now I receive updates whenever one of them gets changed.  At least
>> most of them were closed, already...
> I just updated the cross-issue-references to use github rather than
> Trac id numbers.  Stupidly, I may have accidentally removed comments
> that were added in the last few days to  issues moved from trac to
> github.  Hopefully not, or at least not many.
> It's probably a good idea to turn off Trac, soon, to keep too many new
> bugs from needing to be ported, and old bugs being commented on.  The
> latter is more of a pain to deal with.

I will look into making the NumPy trac read-only. It should not be too
complicated to extend Pauli's code to redirect the tickets part to
github issues.

Have we decided what to do with the wiki content ?


More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list