[Numpy-discussion] Issue tracking
travis at continuum.io
Tue Oct 23 11:13:34 EDT 2012
On Oct 23, 2012, at 9:58 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 5:05 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones <thouis at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones <thouis at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones <thouis at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones <thouis at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> I started the import with the oldest 75 and newest 125 Trac issues,
>>>>> and will wait a few hours to do the rest to allow feedback, just in
>>>>> case something is broken that I haven't noticed.
>>>>> I did make one change to better emulate Trac behavior. Some Trac
>>>>> usernames are also email addresses, which Trac anonymizes in its
>>>>> display. I decided it was safer to do the same.
>>>> The import is running again, though I've been having some failures in
>>>> a few comments and general hangs (these might be network related).
>>>> I'm keeping track of which issues might have had difficulties.
>>>> @endolith noticed that I didn't correctly relink #XXX trac id numbers
>>>> to github id numbers (both trac and github create links
>>>> automatically), so that will have to be handled by a postprocessing
>>>> script (which it probably would have, anyway, since the github # isn't
>>>> known before import).
>>> Import has finished.
>>> The following trac #s had issues in creating the comments (I think due
>>> to network problems): 182, 297, 619, 621, 902, 904, 909 913, 914, 915,
>>> 1044, 1526. I'll review them and see if I can pull in anything
>>> I'll also work on a script for updating the trac crossrefs to github crossrefs.
>>> In the "no good deed goes unpunished" category, I accidentally logged
>>> in as myself (rather than numpy-gitbot) and pushed about 500 issues,
>>> so now I receive updates whenever one of them gets changed. At least
>>> most of them were closed, already...
>> I just updated the cross-issue-references to use github rather than
>> Trac id numbers. Stupidly, I may have accidentally removed comments
>> that were added in the last few days to issues moved from trac to
>> github. Hopefully not, or at least not many.
>> It's probably a good idea to turn off Trac, soon, to keep too many new
>> bugs from needing to be ported, and old bugs being commented on. The
>> latter is more of a pain to deal with.
> I will look into making the NumPy trac read-only. It should not be too
> complicated to extend Pauli's code to redirect the tickets part to
> github issues.
> Have we decided what to do with the wiki content ?
I believe there is a wiki dump command in trac wiki. We should put that content linked off the numpy pages at github.
Thanks for helping with this.
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
More information about the NumPy-Discussion