[Numpy-discussion] Issue tracking

[Charles R Harris]

On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones <thouis at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Charles R Harris
> <charlesr.harris at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones <thouis at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:46 AM, David Cournapeau <cournape at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Thouis, what needs to be done to make a testbed of the conversion ?
> >>
> >> I just returned to this a couple of days ago [*], and last night
> >> successfully imported all the trac issues (from my somewhat
> >> out-of-date snapshot) to this repo:
> >> https://github.com/thouis/numpy-trac-migration
> >>
> >> Note that there are currently multiple copies of many issues.  This is
> >> because github has no way to actually delete an issue, and I didn't
> >> bother marking issues that were from failed runs during debugging.  If
> >> you see two copies of an issue with differences in their
> >> body/comments, the one with the higher github issue # is the one
> >> generated last night.
> >>
> >> The code that actually does the import is in that repository, as well.
> >>  Thanks to the networkX group for alpha-testing the code.
> >>
> >
> > Thouis, will you want commit privileges?
>
> Yes, though I created a bot account to keep from injecting myself into
> the history: https://github.com/numpy-gitbot
>
> Someone could also just run the import as the "numpy" github user.
>
>
You're in.

Chuck
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20120927/4d0501f5/attachment.html>