[Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.7.1 release

Frédéric Bastien nouiz at nouiz.org
Fri Apr 26 09:27:43 EDT 2013

Sorry, I didn't saw the release candidate. I was away for 1 mounts and
didn't read all my email in order.

Normally I try to test the release candidate, but I wasn't able this time.
I have nothing to report again NumPy 1.7.1. I reread the previous emails
and I remark that I badly read the first time one of them. I understood
someone suggested to do a release candidate as if you didn't do that, but
he wrote about not doing a 1.7.2 for datetime!

Sorry for the noise.


On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Ondřej Čertík <ondrej.certik at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Frédéric Bastien <nouiz at nouiz.org>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > A big thanks for that release.
> >
> > I also think it would be useful to do a release candidate about this.
> This
> > release changed the behavior releated to python long and broke a test in
> > Theano. Nothing important, but we could have fixed this before the
> release.
> >
> > The numpy change is that a python long that don't fit in an int64, but
> fit
> > in an uint64, was throwing an overflow exception. Now it return an
> uint64.
> My apologies for this. There was a release candidate here:
> http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2013-March/065948.html
> and I don't see any offending patch between the 1.7.1rc1 and 1.7.1.
> If the bugs are in numpy, would you please report it into issues? So
> that we can fix it.
> Thanks,
> Ondrej
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20130426/8257db43/attachment.html>

More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list