[Numpy-discussion] Deprecation of financial routines

David Cournapeau cournape at gmail.com
Mon Aug 19 02:46:01 EDT 2013


I am +1 as well, I don't think they should have been included in the first
place.

The deprecation should happen after a separate package has been made
available, in case some people depend on it.


On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Juan Luis Cano <juanlu001 at gmail.com> wrote:

> As now master is open for 1.9, following the discussion opened here
>
> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/2880
>
> it was suggested that we deprecate and eventually remove the financial
> functions in NumPy, because they pollute the main namespace and some are
> unimplemented. We could put them in a separate package, in case it
> doesn't exist yet. Nathaniel Smith and Ralf Gommers already gave +1, and
> Charles Harris suggested bringing this up in the mailing list.
>
> Thoughts?
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20130819/b1622730/attachment.html>


More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list