[Numpy-discussion] NumPy-Discussion Digest, Vol 83, Issue 33

Tue Aug 20 20:17:50 EDT 2013

Hi,
How I can do this:
int(scipy.comb(20314,117))
...
OverflowError: cannot convert float infinity to integer

abs,
Koblitz

2013/8/20 <numpy-discussion-request at scipy.org>

> Send NumPy-Discussion mailing list submissions to
>         numpy-discussion at scipy.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         numpy-discussion-request at scipy.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         numpy-discussion-owner at scipy.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of NumPy-Discussion digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. OS X binaries for releases (Ralf Gommers)
>    2. Re: OS X binaries for releases (David Cournapeau)
>    3. Re: OS X binaries for releases (KACVINSKY Tom)
>    4. Re: OS X binaries for releases (David Cournapeau)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 22:48:51 +0200
> From: Ralf Gommers <ralf.gommers at gmail.com>
> Subject: [Numpy-discussion] OS X binaries for releases
> To: Discussion of Numerical Python <numpy-discussion at scipy.org>
> Message-ID:
>         <
> CABL7CQjaCXp2GrtT8HVmaYAjRm0xmtn1Qt71WKdnbGq7dLU0cQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi all,
>
> Building binaries for releases is currently quite complex and
> time-consuming. For OS X we need two different machines, because we still
> provide binaries for OS X 10.5 and PPC machines. I propose to not do this
> anymore. It doesn't mean we completely drop support for 10.5 and PPC, just
> that we don't produce binaries. PPC was phased out in 2006 and OS X 10.6
> came out in 2009, so there can't be a lot of demand for it (and the
> download stats at
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.7.1/confirm this).
>
> Furthermore I propose to not provide 2.6 binaries anymore. Downloads of 2.6
> OS X binaries were <5% of the 2.7 ones. We did the same with 2.4 for a long
> time - support it but no binaries.
>
> So what we'd have left at the moment is only the 64-bit/32-bit universal
> binary for 10.6 and up. What we finally need to add is 3.x OS X binaries.
> We can make an attempt to build these on 10.8 - since we have access to a
> hosted 10.8 Mac Mini it would allow all devs to easily do a release
> (leaving aside the Windows issue). If anyone has tried the 10.6 SDK on 10.8
> and knows if it actually works, that would be helpful.
>
> Any concerns, objections?
>
> Cheers,
> Ralf
>
> P.S. the same proposal applies of course also to scipy
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20130820/4d74e9d0/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 23:17:19 +0100
> From: David Cournapeau <cournape at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] OS X binaries for releases
> To: Discussion of Numerical Python <numpy-discussion at scipy.org>
> Message-ID:
>         <CAGY4rcXt+=
> 09qP4TJdCzpXkyWStBKfeXODzuMo9MQe9XYy5jwA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gommers at gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Building binaries for releases is currently quite complex and
> > time-consuming. For OS X we need two different machines, because we still
> > provide binaries for OS X 10.5 and PPC machines. I propose to not do this
> > anymore. It doesn't mean we completely drop support for 10.5 and PPC,
> just
> > that we don't produce binaries. PPC was phased out in 2006 and OS X 10.6
> > came out in 2009, so there can't be a lot of demand for it (and the
> > download stats at
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.7.1/confirm this).
> >
> > Furthermore I propose to not provide 2.6 binaries anymore. Downloads of
> > 2.6 OS X binaries were <5% of the 2.7 ones. We did the same with 2.4 for
> a
> > long time - support it but no binaries.
> >
> > So what we'd have left at the moment is only the 64-bit/32-bit universal
> > binary for 10.6 and up. What we finally need to add is 3.x OS X binaries.
> > We can make an attempt to build these on 10.8 - since we have access to a
> > hosted 10.8 Mac Mini it would allow all devs to easily do a release
> > (leaving aside the Windows issue). If anyone has tried the 10.6 SDK on
> 10.8
> > and knows if it actually works, that would be helpful.
> >
>
> I am not sure one can use 10.6 SDK on 10.8 ? I am actually looking into
> those issues for our mac support at Enthought
>
> Are you here for euroscipy ?
>
> David
>
> >
> > Any concerns, objections?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Ralf
> >
> > P.S. the same proposal applies of course also to scipy
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> > NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
> >
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20130820/b3b69f9c/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 22:20:21 +0000
> From: KACVINSKY Tom <Tom.KACVINSKY at 3ds.com>
> Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] OS X binaries for releases
> To: Discussion of Numerical Python <numpy-discussion at scipy.org>
> Message-ID: <35E5002C-FDEA-45FD-A43A-762FCCDEA8F7 at 3ds.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> You can use the 10.6 SDK on 10.8.  At least we do.
>
> Tom
>
> On Aug 20, 2013, at 18:17, "David Cournapeau" <cournape at gmail.com<mailto:
> cournape at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gommers at gmail.com
> <mailto:ralf.gommers at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Building binaries for releases is currently quite complex and
> time-consuming. For OS X we need two different machines, because we still
> provide binaries for OS X 10.5 and PPC machines. I propose to not do this
> anymore. It doesn't mean we completely drop support for 10.5 and PPC, just
> that we don't produce binaries. PPC was phased out in 2006 and OS X 10.6
> came out in 2009, so there can't be a lot of demand for it (and the
> download stats at http://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.7.1/confirm this).
>
> Furthermore I propose to not provide 2.6 binaries anymore. Downloads of
> 2.6 OS X binaries were <5% of the 2.7 ones. We did the same with 2.4 for a
> long time - support it but no binaries.
>
> So what we'd have left at the moment is only the 64-bit/32-bit universal
> binary for 10.6 and up. What we finally need to add is 3.x OS X binaries.
> We can make an attempt to build these on 10.8 - since we have access to a
> hosted 10.8 Mac Mini it would allow all devs to easily do a release
> (leaving aside the Windows issue). If anyone has tried the 10.6 SDK on 10.8
> and knows if it actually works, that would be helpful.
>
> I am not sure one can use 10.6 SDK on 10.8 ? I am actually looking into
> those issues for our mac support at Enthought
>
> Are you here for euroscipy ?
>
> David
>
> Any concerns, objections?
>
> Cheers,
> Ralf
>
> P.S. the same proposal applies of course also to scipy
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org<mailto:NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org>
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org<mailto:NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org>
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
> This email and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the
> individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may be confidential and/or
> privileged.
>
> If you are not one of the named recipients or have received this email in
> error,
>
> (i) you should not read, disclose, or copy it,
>
> (ii) please notify sender of your receipt by reply email and delete this
> email and all attachments,
>
> (iii) Dassault Systemes does not accept or assume any liability or
> responsibility for any use of or reliance on this email.
>
> For other languages, go to http://www.3ds.com/terms/email-disclaimer
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20130820/baca79c9/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 23:31:11 +0100
> From: David Cournapeau <cournape at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] OS X binaries for releases
> To: Discussion of Numerical Python <numpy-discussion at scipy.org>
> Message-ID:
>         <CAGY4rcUR=cty1asAp1fwhAY6hStbiEU_R+DZs86nJ=
> VKO+9zXQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 11:20 PM, KACVINSKY Tom <Tom.KACVINSKY at 3ds.com
> >wrote:
>
> >  You can use the 10.6 SDK on 10.8.  At least we do.
> >
>
> With which compiler ?
>
> David
>
> >
> >  Tom
> >
> > On Aug 20, 2013, at 18:17, "David Cournapeau" <cournape at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gommers at gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >>  Hi all,
> >>
> >>  Building binaries for releases is currently quite complex and
> >> time-consuming. For OS X we need two different machines, because we
> still
> >> provide binaries for OS X 10.5 and PPC machines. I propose to not do
> this
> >> anymore. It doesn't mean we completely drop support for 10.5 and PPC,
> just
> >> that we don't produce binaries. PPC was phased out in 2006 and OS X 10.6
> >> came out in 2009, so there can't be a lot of demand for it (and the
> >> download stats at
> >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.7.1/ confirm this).
> >>
> >>  Furthermore I propose to not provide 2.6 binaries anymore. Downloads of
> >> 2.6 OS X binaries were <5% of the 2.7 ones. We did the same with 2.4
> for a
> >> long time - support it but no binaries.
> >>
> >>  So what we'd have left at the moment is only the 64-bit/32-bit
> >> universal binary for 10.6 and up. What we finally need to add is 3.x OS
> X
> >> binaries. We can make an attempt to build these on 10.8 - since we have
> >> access to a hosted 10.8 Mac Mini it would allow all devs to easily do a
> >> release (leaving aside the Windows issue). If anyone has tried the 10.6
> SDK
> >> on 10.8 and knows if it actually works, that would be helpful.
> >>
> >
> >  I am not sure one can use 10.6 SDK on 10.8 ? I am actually looking into
> > those issues for our mac support at Enthought
> >
> >  Are you here for euroscipy ?
> >
> >  David
> >
> >>
> >>  Any concerns, objections?
> >>
> >>  Cheers,
> >> Ralf
> >>
> >>  P.S. the same proposal applies of course also to scipy
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> >> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
> >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
> >>
> >>
> >    _______________________________________________
> > NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> > NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
> >
> >  This email and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the
> > individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may be confidential
> and/or
> > privileged.
> >
> > If you are not one of the named recipients or have received this email in
> > error,
> >
> > (i) you should not read, disclose, or copy it,
> >
> > (ii) please notify sender of your receipt by reply email and delete this
> > email and all attachments,
> >
> > (iii) Dassault Systemes does not accept or assume any liability or
> > responsibility for any use of or reliance on this email.
> >
> >  For other languages, go to http://www.3ds.com/terms/email-disclaimer
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> > NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
> >
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20130820/e939bfa6/attachment.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
>
> End of NumPy-Discussion Digest, Vol 83, Issue 33
> ************************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20130820/59852169/attachment.html>