[Numpy-discussion] nasty bug in 1.8.0??

[Julian Taylor]

I opened a ticket for it, though thinking about it, its probably
intentional be intentional to find code that assumes it can use the
strides to get the itemsize.
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/4091


On 02.12.2013 20:35, Neal Becker wrote:
> I don't think that behavior is acceptable.
> 
> Frédéric Bastien wrote:
> 
>> It is the NPY_RELAXED_STRIDES_CHECKING=1 flag that caused this.
>>
>> Fred
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Neal Becker <ndbecker2 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I built using:
>>>
>>> CFLAGS='-march=native -O3' NPY_RELAXED_STRIDES_CHECKING=1 python3 setup.py
>>> install --user
>>>
>>>
>>> aπid wrote:
>>>
>>>> I get:
>>>>
>>>> In [4]: x.strides
>>>> Out[4]: (8,)
>>>>
>>>> Same architecture and OS, Numpy installed via Pip on Python 2.7.5.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2 December 2013 20:08, Neal Becker <ndbecker2 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This is np 1.8.0 on fedora x86_64:
>>>>>
>>>>> In [5]: x =np.array ((1,))
>>>>>
>>>>> In [6]: x.shape
>>>>> Out[6]: (1,)
>>>>>
>>>>> In [7]: x.strides
>>>>> Out[7]: (9223372036854775807,)
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
>>>>> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
>>>>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
>>> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
>>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>> _______________________________________________
>> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
>> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>