[Numpy-discussion] How many build systems do we need?

Charles R Harris charlesr.harris at gmail.com
Sun Jan 13 10:50:15 EST 2013


On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 6:44 AM, David Cournapeau <cournape at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 7:29 AM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gommers at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Charles R Harris
> > <charlesr.harris at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> In the continuing proposal for cleanups, note that we currently support
> >> three (3!) build systems, distutils, scons, and bento. That's a bit
> much to
> >> maintain when contemplating changes, and scons and bento both have
> external
> >> dependencies. Can we dispense with any of these? Thoughts?
> >
> >
> > Numscons is the only one that can be dropped. I'm still using it
> regularly,
> > but the few things it does better than bento can be easily improved in
> > bento. So if removing numscons support from master saves some developer
> > hours, +1 from me.
>
> I think numscons was already scheduled to be dropped in 1.7 (and next
> version of scipy as well) ? I am certainly in favor of dropping it as
> well.
>

Is bento documented anywhere or can you commit to keeping it working for
numpy?

Chuck
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20130113/ef23ffe5/attachment.html>


More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list