[Numpy-discussion] numpy.filled, again

[Ralf Gommers]

On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Nathaniel Smith <njs at pobox.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 2:15 AM,  <josef.pktd at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gommers at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 6:43 PM, <josef.pktd at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Charles R Harris
> >>> <charlesr.harris at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 4:37 AM, Nathaniel Smith <njs at pobox.com>
> wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> So this petered off...any objections to np.full?
> >>
> >>
> >> No objection.
> >
> > full full full
>
> Great, then let's put an end to this! Merged.


Great.

Special thanks to Eric Firing for fixing some np.ma bugs in response to a
"that module is not maintained" statement.

Ralf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20130630/3b09b6db/attachment.html>