[Numpy-discussion] GSoC proposal -- Numpy SciPy

Daπid davidmenhur at gmail.com
Wed May 1 14:32:42 EDT 2013

On 1 May 2013 20:12, Blake Griffith <blake.a.griffith at gmail.com> wrote:
> However, it would still be useful to have ufuncs working well with the
> sparse package.

How are you planning to deal with ufunc(0) != 0? cos(sparse) is actually dense.

More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list