[Numpy-discussion] Really cruel draft of vbench setup for NumPy (.add.reduce benchmarks since 2011)
lists at onerussian.com
Mon May 6 12:11:53 EDT 2013
On Mon, 06 May 2013, Sebastian Berg wrote:
> > if you care to tune it up/extend and then I could fire it up again on
> > that box (which doesn't do anything else ATM AFAIK). Since majority of
> > time is spent actually building it (did it with ccache though) it would
> > be neat if you come up with more of benchmarks to run which you might
> > think could be interesting/important.
> I think this is pretty cool! Probably would be a while until there are
> many tests, but if you or someone could set such thing up it could
> slowly grow when larger code changes are done?
that is the idea but it would be nice to gather such simple
benchmark-tests. if you could hint on the numpy functionality you think
especially worth benchmarking (I know -- there is a lot of things
which could be set to be benchmarked) -- that would be a nice starting
point: just list functionality/functions you consider of primary
interest. and either it is worth testing for different types or just a
gross estimate (e.g. for the selection of types in a loop)
As for myself -- I guess I will add fancy indexing and slicing tests.
Adding them is quite easy: have a look at
which is actually a bit more cumbersome because of running them for
This one is more obvious:
Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Ph.D.
http://neuro.debian.net http://www.pymvpa.org http://www.fail2ban.org
Senior Research Associate, Psychological and Brain Sciences Dept.
Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755
Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419
More information about the NumPy-Discussion