[Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.8.0 beta 1 release
Charles R Harris
charlesr.harris at gmail.com
Tue Sep 3 21:01:56 EDT 2013
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Charles R Harris
<charlesr.harris at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Christoph Gohlke <cgohlke at uci.edu> wrote:
>
>> On 9/3/2013 4:45 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Christoph Gohlke <cgohlke at uci.edu
>> > <mailto:cgohlke at uci.edu>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On 9/3/2013 2:51 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Christoph Gohlke <cgohlke at uci.edu<mailto:
>> cgohlke at uci.edu>
>> > > <mailto:cgohlke at uci.edu <mailto:cgohlke at uci.edu>>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > On 9/1/2013 9:54 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hi all,
>> > >
>> > > I'm happy to announce the first beta release of Numpy
>> 1.8.0.
>> > > Please try
>> > > this beta and report any issues on the numpy-dev mailing
>> list.
>> > >
>> > > Source tarballs and release notes can be found at
>> > >https://sourceforge.net/__projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.__8.0b1/
>> > > <
>> https://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.8.0b1/>.
>> > > The Windows
>> > > and OS X installers will follow when the infrastructure
>> issues
>> > > are dealt
>> > > with.
>> > >
>> > > Chuck
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Hello,
>> > >
>> > > I tried numpy-1.8.0.dev-86a6e6c with msvc9 and MKL 11.1 on
>> > > win-amd64-py2.7. It builds OK but there are 23 test errors
>> and 6
>> > > failures (attached).
>> > >
>> > > Some 3rd party packages (e.g. scipy, numexpr, pytables,
>> bottleneck,
>> > > pandas and matplotlib) that were built against numpy-MKL 1.7
>> fail
>> > > tests when used with numpy-MKL 1.8. Other packages test OK
>> (e.g.
>> > > skimage, sklearn, statsmodels, mahotas, pygame). See
>> > > <
>> http://www.lfd.uci.edu/~__gohlke/pythonlibs/tests/__20130902-win-amd64-py2.7-__numpy-1.8.0.dev-86a6e6c/
>> > <
>> http://www.lfd.uci.edu/%7E__gohlke/pythonlibs/tests/__20130902-win-amd64-py2.7-__numpy-1.8.0.dev-86a6e6c/
>> >
>> > > <
>> http://www.lfd.uci.edu/%7Egohlke/pythonlibs/tests/20130902-win-amd64-py2.7-numpy-1.8.0.dev-86a6e6c/
>> >>
>> > > compared to
>> > > <
>> http://www.lfd.uci.edu/~__gohlke/pythonlibs/tests/__20130902-win-amd64-py2.7/
>> > <
>> http://www.lfd.uci.edu/%7E__gohlke/pythonlibs/tests/__20130902-win-amd64-py2.7/
>> >
>> > > <
>> http://www.lfd.uci.edu/%7Egohlke/pythonlibs/tests/20130902-win-amd64-py2.7/
>> >>.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > I have not looked in more detail or at other Python versions
>> yet.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Thanks Christoph,
>> > >
>> > > Looks like some work to do. I wonder what is different between
>> windows
>> > > and linux here?
>> > >
>> > > Chuck
>> > >
>> >
>> > Looks like the fundamental PyArray_PyIntAsIntp function is broken
>> on 64
>> > bit Windows. 64 bit PyLong values are intermediately stored in a 32
>> bit
>> > C long variable. But maybe I am missing something...
>> > <
>> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/blob/maintenance/1.8.x/numpy/core/src/multiarray/conversion_utils.c#L729
>> >
>> > <
>> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/blob/maintenance/1.8.x/numpy/core/src/multiarray/conversion_utils.c#L767
>> >
>> >
>> > My, that does look suspicious. That function is new in 1.8 I believe.
>> > Looks like it needs fixing whatever else it fixes.
>> >
>> > Chuck
>> >
>>
>> In fact, using a npy_longlong instead of npy_long fixes all numpy test
>> errors and failures. But it probably foils the recent optimizations.
>>
>
> Great! I think the function is not used for numeric things so I'm not sure
> what optimizations could be affected. I'll put up a PR and backport it.
>
>
Looks like there are several errors in that function.
Chuck
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20130903/dd532abb/attachment.html>
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list