[Numpy-discussion] The BLAS problem (was: Re: Wiki page for building numerical stuff on Windows)
njs at pobox.com
Fri Apr 11 19:42:03 EDT 2014
Okay, I started taking notes here:
Please add as appropriate...
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Nathaniel Smith <njs at pobox.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Julian Taylor
> <jtaylor.debian at googlemail.com> wrote:
>> x86 cpus are backward compatible with almost all instructions they ever
>> introduced, so one machine with the latest instruction set supported is
>> sufficient to test almost everything.
>> For that the runtime kernel selection must be tuneable via the
>> environment so you can use kernels intended for older cpus.
> Overriding runtime kernel selection sounds like a good bite-sized
> feature that could be added to OpenBLAS...
>> The larger issue is finding a good and thorough testsuite that wasn't
>> written 30 years ago and thus does covers problem sizes larger than a
>> few megabytes. These are the problem sizes are that often crashed
>> openblas in the past.
>> Isn't there a kind of comprehensive BLAS verification testsuite which
>> all BLAS implementations should test against and contribute to available
>> E.g. like the POSIX compliance testsuite.
> I doubt it! Someone could make a good start on one in an afternoon
> though. (Only a start, but half a test suite is heck of a lot better
> than nothing.)
> Nathaniel J. Smith
> Postdoctoral researcher - Informatics - University of Edinburgh
Nathaniel J. Smith
Postdoctoral researcher - Informatics - University of Edinburgh
More information about the NumPy-Discussion