[Numpy-discussion] Wiki page for building numerical stuff on Windows

Eelco Hoogendoorn hoogendoorn.eelco at gmail.com
Sat Apr 12 03:24:04 EDT 2014

I wonder: how hard would it be to create a more 21th-century oriented BLAS,
relying more on code generation tools, and perhaps LLVM/JITting?

Wouldn't we get ten times the portability with one-tenth the lines of code?
Or is there too much dark magic going on in BLAS for such an approach to
come close enough to hand-tuned performance?

On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Sturla Molden <sturla.molden at gmail.com>wrote:

> On 11/04/14 04:44, Matthew Brett wrote:
> > I've been working on a general wiki page on building numerical stuff on
> Windows:
> >
> > https://github.com/numpy/numpy/wiki/Numerical-software-on-Windows
> I am worried that the conclusion will be that there is no viable BLAS
> alternative on Windows...
> Sturla
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20140412/dc416019/attachment.html>

More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list