[Numpy-discussion] help using np.correlate to produce correlograms.
jtaylor.debian at googlemail.com
Thu Dec 11 05:19:18 EST 2014
I think it is a good time to discuss/implement further correlate
I kind of favor the mode=(tuple of integers) api for your proposed change.
Concerning the C-API we probably need to add a new wrapper function but
thats ok, the C-API does not need to be as nice as the python API as it
has far less and typically more experienced users.
I also think its time we can remove the old_behavior flag which has been
there since 1.4.
Are there objections to that?
Also on a side note, in 1.10 np.convolve/correlate has been
significantly speed up if one of the sequences is less than 12 elements
On 12/11/2014 09:54 AM, Pierre Haessig wrote:
> As a side note, I've still in mind the proposal I made back in 2013 to
> make np.correlate faster
> The basic idea is to enable the user to select the exact range of lags
> he wants. Unfortunately I didn't take the time to go further than the
> specification above...
> Le 10/12/2014 21:40, Jose Guzman a écrit :
>> Dear Pierre,
>> thank you very much for your time to correct my notebook and to point me
>> in the direction of my wrong lag estimation. It has been very useful!
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
More information about the NumPy-Discussion