[Numpy-discussion] svd error checking vs. speed
sturla.molden at gmail.com
Mon Feb 17 13:24:24 EST 2014
Sturla Molden <sturla.molden at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dave Hirschfeld <novin01 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Even if lapack_lite always performed the isfinite check and threw a python
>> error if False, it would be much better than either hanging or segfaulting and
>> people who care about the isfinite cost probably would be linking to a fast
>> lapack anyway.
> +1 (if I have a vote)
> Correctness is always more important than speed. Segfaulting or hanging
> while burning the CPU is not something we should allow "by design". And
> those who need speed should in any case use a different lapack library
> instead. The easiest place to put a finiteness test is the check_object
> function here:
> But in that case we should probably use a macro guard to leave it out if
> any other LAPACK than the builtin f2c version is used.
It seems even the more recent (3.4.x) versions of LAPACK have places where
NANs can cause infinite loops. As long as this is an issue it might perhaps
be worth checking everywhere.
The semi-official C interface LAPACKE implements NAN checking as well:
If Intel's engineers put NAN checking inside LAPACKE it probably were for a
More information about the NumPy-Discussion