[Numpy-discussion] `allclose` vs `assert_allclose`
Tony Yu
tsyu80 at gmail.com
Wed Jul 16 00:37:13 EDT 2014
Is there any reason why the defaults for `allclose` and `assert_allclose`
differ? This makes debugging a broken test much more difficult. More
importantly, using an absolute tolerance of 0 causes failures for some
common cases. For example, if two values are very close to zero, a test
will fail:
np.testing.assert_allclose(0, 1e-14)
Git blame suggests the change was made in the following commit, but I guess
that change only reverted to the original behavior.
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/commit/f43223479f917e404e724e6a3df27aa701e6d6bf
It seems like the defaults for `allclose` and `assert_allclose` should
match, and an absolute tolerance of 0 is probably not ideal. I guess this
is a pretty big behavioral change, but the current default for
`assert_allclose` doesn't seem ideal.
Thanks,
-Tony
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20140715/e960b35f/attachment.html>
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list