[Numpy-discussion] [RFC] should we argue for a matrix power operator, @@?

[Robert Kern]

On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Nathaniel Smith <njs at pobox.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 4:32 AM, Nathaniel Smith <njs at pobox.com> wrote:
>> For this discussion let's assume @ can be taken for granted, and that
>> we can freely choose to either add @@ or not add @@ to the language.
>> The question is: which do we think makes Python a better language (for
>> us and in general)?
>
> The thread so far, it sounds like the consensus answer is "meh,
> whatever". So I'm thinking we should just drop @@ from the PEP, and if
> it turns out that this is a problem we can always revisit it in the
> ~3.6/3.7 timeframe.

+1. Thanks!

-- 
Robert Kern