[Numpy-discussion] 1.10 release again.

[Ralf Gommers]

On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Charles R Harris <charlesr.harris at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I'd like to mark current PR's for inclusion in 1.10.
>

Good idea. If you're going to do this, it may be helpful to create a new
1.10 milestone and keep but clean up the "1.10 blockers" milestone so there
are only real blockers in there.


> If there is something that you want to have in the release, please mention
> it here by PR #.I think new enhancement PR's should be considered for 1.11
> rather than 1.10, but bug fixes will go in.
>

Assuming you mean "no guarantees for anything that comes in from now on",
rather then "no one is allowed to merge new enhancements PRs before the
release split" - makes sense.

There is some flexibility, of course, as there are always last minute items
> that come up when release contents are begin decided.
>

I had a look through the complete set again. Of the ones that are not yet
marked for 1.10, those that look important to get in are:
- new "contract" function (#5488)
- the whole set of numpy.ma PRs
- the two numpy.distutils PRs (#4378, #5597)
- rewrite of docs on indexing (#4331)
- deciding on a bool indexing deprecation (#4353)
- weighted covariance for corrcoef (#4960)

There are too many PRs marked as "1.10 blockers", I think the only real
blockers are:
- __numpy_ufunc__ PRs (#4815, #4855)
- sgemv segfault workaround (#5237)
- fix for alignment issue (#5656)
- resolving the debate on diagonal (#5407)

Ralf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20150406/c97a2838/attachment.html>