[Numpy-discussion] Consider improving numpy.outer's behavior with zero-dimensional vectors

[Nathaniel Smith]

I am, yes.
On Apr 14, 2015 9:17 PM, "Neil Girdhar" <mistersheik at gmail.com> wrote:

> Ok, I didn't know that.  Are you at pycon by any chance?
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Nathaniel Smith <njs at pobox.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Neil Girdhar <mistersheik at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Yes, I totally agree with you regarding np.sum and np.product, which is
>> why
>> > I didn't suggest np.add.reduce, np.multiply.reduce.  I wasn't sure
>> whether
>> > cumsum and cumprod might be on the line in your judgment.
>>
>> Ah, I see. I think we should treat them the same for now -- all the
>> comments I made apply to a lesser or greater extent (in particular,
>> cumsum and cumprod both do the thing where they dispatch to .cumsum()
>> .cumprod() method).
>>
>> -n
>>
>> --
>> Nathaniel J. Smith -- http://vorpus.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
>> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20150414/83165d95/attachment.html>