[Numpy-discussion] future of f2py and Fortran90+
efiring at hawaii.edu
Thu Dec 3 16:38:55 EST 2015
On 2015/12/03 11:08 AM, Yuxiang Wang wrote:
> Too add to Sturla - I think this is what he mentioned but in more details:
Right, but for each function that requires writing two wrappers, one in
Fortran and a second one in cython. Even though they are very simple,
this would be cumbersome for a library with more than a few functions.
Therefore I think there is still a place for f2py and f90wrap, and I am
happy to see development continuing at least on the latter.
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Sturla Molden <sturla.molden at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Eric Firing <efiring at hawaii.edu> wrote:
>>> I'm curious: has anyone been looking into what it would take to enable
>>> f2py to handle modern Fortran in general? And into prospects for
>>> getting such an effort funded?
>> No need. Use Cython and Fortran 2003 ISO C bindings. That is the only
>> portable way to interop between Fortran and C (including CPython) anyway.
>> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
>> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
More information about the NumPy-Discussion