[Numpy-discussion] Where is Jaime?
Nathaniel Smith
njs at pobox.com
Sun Dec 6 21:05:35 EST 2015
On Dec 6, 2015 6:03 PM, "Peter Creasey" <p.e.creasey.00 at googlemail.com>
wrote:
>
> >
> > Is the interp fix in the google pipeline or do we need a workaround?
> >
>
> Oooh, if someone is looking at changing interp, is there any chance
> that fp could be extended to take complex128 rather than just float
> values? I.e. so that I could write:
>
> >>> y = interp(mu, theta, m)
> rather than
> >>> y = interp(mu, theta, m.real) + 1.0j*interp(mu, theta, m.imag)
>
> which *sounds* like it might be simple and more (Num)pythonic.
That sounds like an excellent improvement and you should submit a PR
implementing it :-).
"The interp fix" in question though is a regression in 1.10 that's blocking
1.10.2, and needs a quick minimal fix asap.
-n
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20151206/5874726f/attachment.html>
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list