[Numpy-discussion] Where is Jaime?
p.e.creasey.00 at googlemail.com
Mon Dec 7 15:42:07 EST 2015
>> > Is the interp fix in the google pipeline or do we need a workaround?
>> Oooh, if someone is looking at changing interp, is there any chance
>> that fp could be extended to take complex128 rather than just float
>> values? I.e. so that I could write:
>> >>> y = interp(mu, theta, m)
>> rather than
>> >>> y = interp(mu, theta, m.real) + 1.0j*interp(mu, theta, m.imag)
>> which *sounds* like it might be simple and more (Num)pythonic.
> That sounds like an excellent improvement and you should submit a PR
> implementing it :-).
> "The interp fix" in question though is a regression in 1.10 that's blocking
> 1.10.2, and needs a quick minimal fix asap.
Good answer - as soon as I hit 'send' I wondered how many bugs get
introduced by people trying to attach feature requests to bug fixes. I
will take a look at the code later and pm you if I get anywhere...
More information about the NumPy-Discussion