[Numpy-discussion] Should dtypes have an ndim attribute?
njs at pobox.com
Thu Dec 10 16:30:33 EST 2015
On Dec 10, 2015 4:11 AM, "Andy Ray Terrel" <andy.terrel at gmail.com> wrote:
> That's essentially what datashape did over in the blaze ecosystem. It
gets a bit fancier to support ragged arrays and optional types.
IIUC this is a much more modest proposal, for numpy's existing dtypes that
It seems pretty harmless I guess. It's a little uncomfortable to be adding
yet another attribute to all dtypes that will only be used by one obscure
subset of dtypes, but it's no worse than a bunch of other already existing
attributes in that respect.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NumPy-Discussion