[Numpy-discussion] what would you expect A[none] to do?

Joe Kington joferkington at gmail.com
Thu Dec 31 11:56:29 EST 2015

Slicing with None adds a new dimension.  It's a common paradigm, though
usually you'd use A[np.newaxis] or A[np.newaxis, ...] instead for
readibility.   (np.newaxis is None, but it's a lot more readable)

There's a good argument to be made that slicing with a single None
shouldn't add a new axis, and only the more readable forms like A[None, :],
A[..., None], etc should.

However, that would rather seriously break backwards compatibility. There's
a fair amount of existing code that assumes "A[None]" prepends a new axis.

On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Neal Becker <ndbecker2 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Neal Becker wrote:
> > In my case, what it does is:
> >
> > A.shape = (5760,)
> > A[none] -> (1, 5760)
> >
> > In my case, use of none here is just a mistake.  But why would you want
> > this to be accepted at all, and how should it be interpreted?
> Actually, in my particular case, if it just acted as a noop, returning the
> original array, that would have been perfect.  No idea if that's a good
> result in general.
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
> https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20151231/9b2b7c84/attachment.html>

More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list