[Numpy-discussion] Improve Numpy Datetime Functionality for Gsoc

SMRUTI RANJAN SAHOO c99.smruti at gmail.com
Wed Mar 25 07:17:28 EDT 2015


so may i know the links for mentor ,so that i can talk with them more ??
can you provide me the links please ???

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gommers at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 6:50 AM, Stephan Hoyer <shoyer at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The most recent discussion about datetime64 was back in March and April
>> of last year:
>>
>> http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2014-March/thread.html#69554
>>
>> http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2014-April/thread.html#69774
>>
>> In addition to unfortunate timezone handling, datetime64 has a lot of
>> bugs -- so many that I don't bother reporting them. But if anyone ever
>> plans on working on them, I can certainly help to assemble a long list of
>> the issues (many of these are mentioned in the above threads).
>>
>> Unfortunately, though I would love to see datetime64 fixed, I'm not
>> really a suitable mentor for this role (I don't know C),
>>
>
> Hi Stephan, thanks for at least considering to mentor. It's always
> possible to help out as a secondary mentor - even if you don't know C, you
> could provide valuable feedback because unlike most numpy devs you're
> actually *using* datetime64.
>
> Cheers,
> Ralf
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20150325/e45d22a9/attachment.html>


More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list