[Numpy-discussion] Improve Numpy Datetime Functionality for Gsoc
ralf.gommers at gmail.com
Wed Mar 25 14:10:48 EDT 2015
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:17 PM, SMRUTI RANJAN SAHOO <c99.smruti at gmail.com>
> so may i know the links for mentor ,so that i can talk with them more ??
> can you provide me the links please ???
Hi Smruti, there are no links. I am one of the mentors, the other mentors
are all reading this list. You'll get the most feedback on this list, so
please ask relevant technical questions here.
If you have further questions on administrative questions that you prefer
to not post in public, you can email me privately.
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gommers at gmail.com>
>> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 6:50 AM, Stephan Hoyer <shoyer at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> The most recent discussion about datetime64 was back in March and April
>>> of last year:
>>> In addition to unfortunate timezone handling, datetime64 has a lot of
>>> bugs -- so many that I don't bother reporting them. But if anyone ever
>>> plans on working on them, I can certainly help to assemble a long list of
>>> the issues (many of these are mentioned in the above threads).
>>> Unfortunately, though I would love to see datetime64 fixed, I'm not
>>> really a suitable mentor for this role (I don't know C),
>> Hi Stephan, thanks for at least considering to mentor. It's always
>> possible to help out as a secondary mentor - even if you don't know C, you
>> could provide valuable feedback because unlike most numpy devs you're
>> actually *using* datetime64.
>> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
>> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NumPy-Discussion