[Numpy-discussion] Let's move forward with the current governance document.

[Nathaniel Smith]

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Sturla Molden <sturla.molden at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Nathaniel Smith <njs at pobox.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Chuck! It looks like it's just wording tweaks / clarifications
> > at this point, so nothing we need to discuss in detail on the list. If
> > anyone wants to watch the sausage being made, then the link is above
> > :-), and we'll continue the discussion in the PR unless anything
> > substantive comes up.
>
> Anyone has a veto? That reminds me of something that happened in the senate
> of Rome; they only had a small number of vetoers, sometimes only one or
> two, and even that caused havoc. I think it should be better clarified how
> much contribution is needed before someone can be considered to have veto
> rights. It would e.g. be ridiculous if I were to begin and veto stuff, as
> my contributions are minute... OMG.

Are you planning to go around vetoing things for ridiculous reasons
and causing havoc?

If so, then notice that the steering council reserves the right to
kick you out ;-). And if not, then who is it that you're worried
about?

-n

-- 
Nathaniel J. Smith -- http://vorpus.org