[Numpy-discussion] nan version of einsum
barberchris01 at gmail.com
Wed Apr 27 18:36:53 EDT 2016
Looks like I was a little confused. It appears that the nan* versions of
functions in numpy just substitute the NaNs in a copy of the original array
and so are just convenience methods. I was imagining that they were
optimized and handling the NaNs at a lower level. It looks like the
"bottleneck" package tries to do this for nansum, nanprod, etc, but I don't
know if it is able to take advantage of SSE or not.
Anyways, maybe if I elaborate someone can offer suggestions.
My application is: given a large N-dimensional array, and a selected
(N-1)-dimensional slice of it, compute the Pearson correlation of that
slice versus all other (N-1)-dimensional slices of the array, omitting
NaN's from the calculation.
Ignoring NaN's for a moment, here is the slow and obvious way to do it:
from scipy.stats import pearsonr
import numpy as np
seed = data.take(index,dim)
res = np.zeros(data.shape[dim])
for i in range(0,data.shape[dim]):
res[i] = pearsonr(seed, data.take(i,dim))
Doing all the math by hand and using einsum, there is an extremely fast
(though fairly cryptic) way of doing this:
def corrs2(data, index, axis):
seed = data.take([index], axis=axis)
sdims = range(0,seed.ndim)
ddims = range(0,data.ndim)
sample_axes = np.array([i for i in ddims if i != axis])
seed_mean = np.einsum(seed, sdims, ) / seed.size
data_mean = np.einsum(data, ddims, [axis]) / seed.size
data_mean.shape = tuple(data.shape[i] if i == axis else 1 for i in
ddims) # restore dims after einsum
seed_dev = np.einsum(seed-seed_mean, sdims, sdims)
numerator = np.einsum(seed_dev, ddims, data, ddims, [axis])
numerator -= np.einsum(seed_dev, ddims, data_mean, ddims, [axis])
denominator = np.einsum(data, ddims, data, ddims, [axis])
denominator += -2.0*np.einsum(data, ddims, data_mean, ddims, [axis])
denominator += np.sum(data_mean**2, axis=sample_axes) * seed.size
denominator *= np.einsum(seed_dev**2, sdims, [axis])
denominator = np.sqrt(denominator)
return np.clip(numerator / denominator, -1.0, 1.0)
It also doesn't need to make a copy of the array. Re-introducing the
requirement to handle NaNs, though, I couldn't find any option besides
making a mask array and introducing that explicitly into the calculations.
That's why I was imagining an optimized "naneinsum."
Are there any existing ways of doing sums and products on numpy arrays that
have a fast way of handling NaNs? Or is a mask array the best thing to
hope for? I think that for this problem that I could transpose and reshape
the N-dimensional array down to 2-dimensions without making an array copy,
which might make it easier to interface with some optimizing package that
doesn't support multidimensional arrays fully.
I am fairly new to making numpy/python fast, and coming from MATLAB am very
impressed, though there are a bewlidering number of options when it comes
to trying to optimize.
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Chris Barber <barberchris01 at gmail.com>
> Is there any interest in a nan-ignoring version of einsum a la nansum,
> nanprod, etc? Any idea how difficult it would be to implement?
> - Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NumPy-Discussion