[Numpy-discussion] Fwd: Multi-distribution Linux wheels - please test

Nathaniel Smith njs at pobox.com
Mon Feb 8 22:59:07 EST 2016


On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Nathaniel Smith <njs at pobox.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Matthew Brett <matthew.brett at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Nathaniel Smith <njs at pobox.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Matthew Brett <matthew.brett at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>> I can't replicate the segfault with manylinux wheels and scipy.  On
>>>> the other hand, I get a new test error for numpy from manylinux, scipy
>>>> from manylinux, like this:
>>>>
>>>> $ python -c 'import scipy.linalg; scipy.linalg.test()'
>>>>
>>>> ======================================================================
>>>> FAIL: test_decomp.test_eigh('general ', 6, 'F', True, False, False, (2, 4))
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>>   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nose/case.py", line
>>>> 197, in runTest
>>>>     self.test(*self.arg)
>>>>   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/scipy/linalg/tests/test_decomp.py",
>>>> line 658, in eigenhproblem_general
>>>>     assert_array_almost_equal(diag2_, ones(diag2_.shape[0]), DIGITS[dtype])
>>>>   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/numpy/testing/utils.py",
>>>> line 892, in assert_array_almost_equal
>>>>     precision=decimal)
>>>>   File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/numpy/testing/utils.py",
>>>> line 713, in assert_array_compare
>>>>     raise AssertionError(msg)
>>>> AssertionError:
>>>> Arrays are not almost equal to 4 decimals
>>>>
>>>> (mismatch 100.0%)
>>>>  x: array([ 0.,  0.,  0.], dtype=float32)
>>>>  y: array([ 1.,  1.,  1.])
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Ran 1507 tests in 14.928s
>>>>
>>>> FAILED (KNOWNFAIL=4, SKIP=1, failures=1)
>>>>
>>>> This is a very odd error, which we don't get when running over a numpy
>>>> installed from source, linked to ATLAS, and doesn't happen when
>>>> running the tests via:
>>>>
>>>> nosetests /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/scipy/linalg
>>>>
>>>> So, something about the copy of numpy (linked to openblas) is
>>>> affecting the results of scipy (also linked to openblas), and only
>>>> with a particular environment / test order.
>>>>
>>>> If you'd like to try and see whether y'all can do a better job of
>>>> debugging than me:
>>>>
>>>> # Run this script inside a docker container started with this incantation:
>>>> # docker run -ti --rm ubuntu:12.04 /bin/bash
>>>> apt-get update
>>>> apt-get install -y python curl
>>>> apt-get install libpython2.7  # this won't be necessary with next
>>>> iteration of manylinux wheel builds
>>>> curl -LO https://bootstrap.pypa.io/get-pip.py
>>>> python get-pip.py
>>>> pip install -f https://nipy.bic.berkeley.edu/manylinux numpy scipy nose
>>>> python -c 'import scipy.linalg; scipy.linalg.test()'
>>>
>>> I just tried this and on my laptop it completed without error.
>>>
>>> Best guess is that we're dealing with some memory corruption bug
>>> inside openblas, so it's getting perturbed by things like exactly what
>>> other calls to openblas have happened (which is different depending on
>>> whether numpy is linked to openblas), and which core type openblas has
>>> detected.
>>>
>>> On my laptop, which *doesn't* show the problem, running with
>>> OPENBLAS_VERBOSE=2 says "Core: Haswell".
>>>
>>> Guess the next step is checking what core type the failing machines
>>> use, and running valgrind... anyone have a good valgrind suppressions
>>> file?
>>
>> My machine (which does give the failure) gives
>>
>> Core: Core2
>>
>> with OPENBLAS_VERBOSE=2
>
> Yep, that allows me to reproduce it:
>
> root at f7153f0cc841:/# OPENBLAS_VERBOSE=2 OPENBLAS_CORETYPE=Core2 python
> -c 'import scipy.linalg; scipy.linalg.test()'
> Core: Core2
> [...]
> ======================================================================
> FAIL: test_decomp.test_eigh('general ', 6, 'F', True, False, False, (2, 4))
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> [...]
>
> So this is indeed sounding like an OpenBLAS issue... next stop
> valgrind, I guess :-/

Here's the valgrind output:
  https://gist.github.com/njsmith/577d028e79f0a80d2797

There's a lot of it, but no smoking guns have jumped out at me :-/

-n

-- 
Nathaniel J. Smith -- https://vorpus.org



More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list