[Numpy-discussion] Changes to generalized ufunc core dimension checking

Stephan Hoyer shoyer at gmail.com
Fri Mar 18 13:22:53 EDT 2016


On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Travis Oliphant <travis at continuum.io>
wrote:

> That's a great idea!
>
> Adding multiple-dispatch capability for this case could also solve a lot
> of issues that right now prevent generalized ufuncs from being the
> mechanism of implementation of *all* NumPy functions.
>
> -Travis
>

For future reference, there's already an issue on GitHub about adding an
axis argument to gufuncs:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/5197

(see also the referenced mailing list discussion from that page.)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20160318/3485aaf2/attachment.html>


More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list