[Numpy-discussion] Using OpenBLAS for manylinux wheels

Freddy Rietdijk freddyrietdijk at fridh.nl
Wed Mar 30 14:26:17 EDT 2016


On Nix/NixOS we've been using OpenBLAS 0.2.14 for some time now because we
had some segmentation faults with 0.2.15 and scipy/scikitlearn. I've tested
the packages you listed, and more, with OpenBLAS 0.2.17 and encountered no
problems.

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Olivier Grisel <olivier.grisel at ensta.org>
wrote:

> The problem with the gfortran failures will be tackled by renaming the
> vendored libgfortran.so library, see:
>
> https://github.com/pypa/auditwheel/issues/24
>
> This is orthogonal to the ATLAS vs OpenBLAS decision though.
>
> --
> Olivier
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
> https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20160330/de94593b/attachment.html>


More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list