[Numpy-discussion] Integers to negative integer powers, time for a decision.
raksi.raksi at gmail.com
Sat Oct 8 18:18:45 EDT 2016
but then that violates the numpy
> principle that output dtypes should be determined entirely by input
> dtypes, without peeking at the actual values. (And this rule is very
> important for avoiding nasty surprises when you run your code on new
At division you get back an array of floats.
>>> y = np.int64([1,2,4])
array([ 1., 2., 4.])
array([ 1., 1., 1.])
Why is it different, if you calculate the power of something?
> And then there's backwards compatibility to consider. As mentioned, we
> *could* deviate from Python by making ** always return float... but
> this would almost certainly break tons and tons of people's code that
> is currently doing integer ** positive integer and expecting to get an
> integer back. Which is something we don't do without very careful
> weighing of the trade-offs, and my intuition is that this one is so
> disruptive we probably can't pull it off. Breaking working code needs
> a *very* compelling reason.
This is a valid reasoning. But it could be solved with raising an exception
to warn the users for the new behaviour.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NumPy-Discussion