[Numpy-discussion] Fwd: [numfocus] Grants up to $3k available to NumFOCUS projects (sponsored & affiliated)
renato.fabbri at gmail.com
Mon Apr 3 08:14:56 EDT 2017
maybe OT, but is has become recurrent to me for already some years
to make a very simple module for obtaining arrays related to musical
scripts/ have Python/Numpy has implementions of the musical elements.
dissertacaoCorrigida.pdf holds a thorough description of the framework.
I idealize it as a module inside Numpy
but I understand it might be reasonable to do it as a Scipy kit.
I handed my doctorate a few days ago and might be willing to
put some time into this.
PS. long time no post. Hello!
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 8:28 AM, Julian Taylor <jtaylor.debian at googlemail.com
> On 31.03.2017 16:07, Julian Taylor wrote:
> > On 31.03.2017 15:51, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> >> On Mar 31, 2017 1:15 AM, "Ralf Gommers" <ralf.gommers at gmail.com
> >> <mailto:ralf.gommers at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Ralf Gommers
> >> <ralf.gommers at gmail.com <mailto:ralf.gommers at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 11:33 PM, Julian Taylor
> >> <jtaylor.debian at googlemail.com
> >> <mailto:jtaylor.debian at googlemail.com>> wrote:
> >> I have two ideas under one big important topic: make numpy
> >> python3
> >> compatible.
> >> The first fits pretty well with the grant size and nobody
> >> wants to do it
> >> for free:
> >> - fix our text IO functions under python3 and support
> >> encodings, not only latin1.
> >> Reasonably simple to do, slap encoding arguments on the
> >> functions,
> >> generate test cases and somehow keep backward compatibility.
> >> Some
> >> prelimary unfinished work is in
> >> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/4208
> >> <https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/4208>
> >> I like that idea, it's a recurring pain point. Are you
> >> interested to work on it, or are you thinking to advertise the
> >> idea here to see if anyone steps up?
> >> More thoughts on this anyone? Or preferences for this idea or the
> >> numpy.org <http://numpy.org> one? Submission deadline is April 3rd
> >> and we can only put in one proposal this time, so we need to (a)
> >> make a choice between these ideas, and (b) write up a proposal.
> >> If there's not enough replies to this so the choice is clear cut, I
> >> will send out a poll to the core devs.
> >> Do we have anyone interested in doing the work in either case? That
> >> seems like the most important consideration to me...
> >> -n
> > I could do the textio thing if no one shows up for numpy.org. I can
> > probably check again what is required in the next few days and write a
> > proposal.
> > The change will need reviewing in the end too, should that be
> > compensated too? It feels weird if not.
> I have decided to not do it, as it is more or less just a bugfix and I
> currently do not feel capable of doing with added completion pressure.
> But I have collected some of related issues and discussions:
> # loadtxt
> # genfromtxt
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at python.org
GNU/Linux User #479299
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NumPy-Discussion