[Numpy-discussion] automatically avoiding temporary arrays
ben.v.root at gmail.com
Mon Feb 27 14:46:18 EST 2017
Ah, that wheel would be a huge help. Most of the packages I have as
dependencies for this project were compiled against v1.10, so I am hoping
that there won't be too big of a problem. Are the mostlinux wheels still
compatible with CentOS5, or has the base image been bumped to CentOS6?
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Matthew Brett <matthew.brett at gmail.com>
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Charles R Harris
> <charlesr.harris at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Benjamin Root <ben.v.root at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >> What's the timeline for the next release? I have the perfect usecase for
> >> this (Haversine calculation on large arrays that takes up ~33% of one
> of my
> >> processing scripts). However, to test it out, I have a huge dependency
> >> to wade through first, and there are no resources devoted to that
> >> for at least a few weeks. I want to make sure I get feedback to y'all.
> > I'd like to branch 1.13.x at the end of March. The planned features that
> > still need to go in are the `__array_ufunc__` work and the `lapack_lite`
> > update. The first RC should not take much longer. I believe Matthew is
> > building wheels for testing on the fly but I don't know where you can
> > them.
> Latest wheels at :
> pip install -f $PRE_URL --pre numpy
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NumPy-Discussion