[Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] Sustainability

Ralf Gommers ralf.gommers at gmail.com
Thu Oct 5 17:14:15 EDT 2017

On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 8:24 AM, Pauli Virtanen <pav at iki.fi> wrote:

> to, 2017-10-05 kello 00:08 +0200, Ilhan Polat kirjoitti:
> [clip]
> > 2. Feature completeness of basic modules.
> I think those judgments can be subjective, but it is true many things
> have been organically grown, and this becomes even more so as the
> number of contributors grows (fielding other people's PRs already takes
> a lot of time). I think most people send something that they need there
> and then, and it is not possible to tell them to go do something else
> instead. So even if there are many contributors, it's less clear how
> available they are for implementing "the plan".
> Regardless, I would recommend anyone who knows something obvious is
> missing that obviously should be included, to send a PR adding it to
> the roadmap:
> https://github.com/scipy/scipy/blob/master/doc/ROADMAP.rst.txt
> This document has not really been updated significantly since the
> single brainstorm in a Scipy conference many years ago, and we did not
> go through the contents then in great detail.

I did update it several times, removing things that were implemented or no
longer relevant. However you're right that especially on the new features
front it could use more inputs.


>         Pauli
> _______________________________________________
> SciPy-Dev mailing list
> SciPy-Dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20171006/dc01d0f8/attachment.html>

More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list