[Numpy-discussion] doc? music through mathematical relations between LPCM samples and musical elements/characteristics
renato.fabbri at gmail.com
Tue Jan 30 17:32:22 EST 2018
the half-shape suite:
was completely synthesized using psychophysical relations
for each resulting 16bit 44kHz samples:
I am thinking about the ways in which to make the documentation
at least to:
* mass (music and audio in sample sequences): the framework.
It might be considered a toolbox, but it is not a package:
* music: a package for making music, including the routines
used to make the half-shape suite:
It seems reasonable at first to:
* upload the package to PyPI (mass is not a package),
music is there (beta but there).
* Make available some summary of the file tree, including
some automated code documentation.
As I follow numpy's convention (or try to), and the package and framework
particularly useful for proficient numpy users,
I used Sphinx. The very preliminary version is:
* Make a nice readthedocs documentation.
"music" project name was taken so I made:
"mass" project name was also taken so I made:
And I found these URLs clumsy. Is there a standard or would you go with
* would you use readthedocs for the sphinx/doxigen
* would you use readthedocs.org or a gitbook would be better or...?
Should I contact the scipy community to make available a scikit or
integrate it to numpy in any way beyond using and citing
BTW. I am using vimwiki with some constant attempt to organize and track
So maybe a unified solution for all these documentation instances
using a wiki structure seems reasonable at the moment.
Maybe upload the generated html from Sphinx and from Vimwiki
GNU/Linux User #479299
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NumPy-Discussion