[Numpy-discussion] Adoption of a Code of Conduct
ralf.gommers at gmail.com
Fri Jul 27 18:30:20 EDT 2018
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 10:02 PM, Stefan van der Walt <stefanv at berkeley.edu>
> Hi everyone,
> A while ago, SciPy (the library) adopted its Code of Conduct:
> We worked hard to make that document friendly, while at the same time
> stating clearly the kinds of behavior that would and would not be
> I propose that we adopt the SciPy code of conduct for NumPy as well. It
> is a good way to signal to newcomers that this is a community that cares
> about how people are treated. And I think we should do anything in our
> power to make NumPy as attractive as possible!
Maybe a bit of context: the SciPy code of conduct had quite a lot of
discussion, and importantly in the end everyone involved in the discussion
was happy with (or at least not displeased by) the final document. Hence I
see it as a good document to adopt also by other projects.
And here's what I wrote as the intro for that CoC discussion:
As you probably know, Code of Conduct (CoC) documents are becoming more
common every year for open source projects, and there are a number of good
reasons to adopt a CoC:
1. It gives us the opportunity to explicitly express the values and
behaviors we'd like to see in our community.
2. It is designed to make everyone feel welcome (and while I think we're a
welcoming community anyway, not having a CoC may look explicitly
unwelcoming to some potential contributors nowadays).
3. It gives us a tool to address a set of problems if and when they occur,
as well as a way for anyone to report issues or behavior that is
unacceptable to them (much better than having those people potentially
leave the community).
4. SciPy is not yet a fiscally sponsored project of NumFOCUS, however I
think we'd like to be in the near future. NumFOCUS has started to require
having a CoC as a prerequisite for new projects joining it. The PSF has
the same requirement for any sponsorship for events/projects that it gives.
Note on (4): NumPy is a sponsored project of NumFOCUS, and I've been asked
several times how it can be that NumPy is sponsored but does not have a
> If we adopt this document as policy, we will need to select a Code of
> Conduct committee, to whom potential transgressions can be reported.
> The individuals doing this for SciPy may very well be happy to do the
> same for NumPy, but the community should decide whom will best serve
> those roles.
> Let me know your thoughts.
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at python.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NumPy-Discussion