[Numpy-discussion] Proposal to accept NEP 15: Merging multiarray and umath

Nathaniel Smith njs at pobox.com
Fri Jun 29 18:23:05 EDT 2018

Note that this is the first formal proposal to accept a NEP using our
new process (yay!). While writing it I realized that the current text
about this in NEP 0 is a bit terse, so I've also just submitted a PR
to expand that section:



On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 3:18 PM, Nathaniel Smith <njs at pobox.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I propose that we accept NEP 15: Merging multiarray and umath:
> http://www.numpy.org/neps/nep-0015-merge-multiarray-umath.html
> The core part of this proposal was uncontroversial. The main point of
> discussion was whether it was OK to deprecate set_numeric_ops, or
> whether it had some legitimate use cases. The conclusion was that in
> all the cases where set_numeric_ops is useful,
> PyUFunc_ReplaceLoopBySignature is a strictly better alternative, so
> there's no reason not to deprecate set_numeric_ops. So at this point I
> think the whole proposal is uncontroversial, and we can go ahead and
> accept it.
> If there are no substantive objections within 7 days from this email,
> then the NEP will be accepted; see NEP 0 for more details:
> http://www.numpy.org/neps/nep-0000.html
> -n
> --
> Nathaniel J. Smith -- https://vorpus.org

Nathaniel J. Smith -- https://vorpus.org

More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list