[Numpy-discussion] Removing priority labels from github

[Charles R Harris]

On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 11:08 AM Charles R Harris <charlesr.harris at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 2:10 PM Ralf Gommers <ralf.gommers at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 4:49 PM Stephan Hoyer <shoyer at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 2:22 AM Sebastian Berg <
>>> sebastian at sipsolutions.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 2018-10-19 at 11:02 +0300, Matti Picus wrote:
>>>> > We currently have highest, high, normal, low, and lowest priority
>>>> > labels
>>>> > for github issues/PRs. At the recent status meeting, we proposed
>>>> > consolidating these to a single "high" priority label. Anything
>>>> > "low"
>>>> > priority should be merged or closed since it will be quickly
>>>> > forgotten,
>>>> > and no "normal" tag is needed.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > With that, we (the BIDS team) would like to encourage reviewers to
>>>> > use
>>>> > the "high" priority tag to indicate things we should be working on.
>>>> >
>>>> > Any objections or thoughts?
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> Sounds like a plan, especially having practically meaningless tags
>>>> right now is no help. Most of them are historical and personally I have
>>>> only been using the milestones to tag things as high priority (very
>>>> occasionally).
>>>>
>>>> - Sebastian
>>>>
>>>
>>> +1 from me as well. I haven't been using these tags at all.
>>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>>
> +1 I may have used one of the priority labels once or twice, I don't
> really remember. When I think something needs to be fixed or merged I
> generally add a benchmark.
>
>
benchmark <- milestone.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20181020/7c88e8bd/attachment.html>