[Numpy-discussion] rescuing missing data documents

Nathaniel Smith njs at pobox.com
Sun Sep 2 04:20:44 EDT 2018

Makes sense to me

On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 9:15 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gommers at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> Recently a few people (Tyler, Matti, myself, maybe others?) were discussing
> the history of missing data in the context of custom dtypes. I mentioned
> that there was a good write-up, but couldn't find it at the time. I just
> stumbled across it, it's hidden in the numpy.org repo:
> http://www.numpy.org/NA-overview. So hope this helps.
> That document further references two alternative NEPs that didn't make it
> into our repo:
> 1. https://gist.github.com/njsmith/1056379 (authors Matthew Brett, Nathaniel
> Smith),
> 2. https://gist.github.com/njsmith/1068264 (author Nathaniel Smith),
> as well as another summary:
> https://github.com/njsmith/numpy/wiki/NA-discussion-status
> I'd like to see the NEPs rescued, and the summary moved from the numpy.org
> repo (maybe into yet another NEP?). It would be best if the original authors
> do this, but otherwise I'm happy to do it. Thoughts?
> Cheers,
> Ralf
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Nathaniel J. Smith -- https://vorpus.org

More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list